What is the immediate goal of the Enemies of Liberty?
That's an interesting question as we watch the 2A infringement effort currently in play. But you would be failing in your role as analyst if you do not pull back for a wider view and consider several events in our own community that many of us found curious as they unfolded. By pulling back for a wide-angle view perhaps we can begin to connect a few dots.
Why are so many White Supremacy racist sites and Christian Identity sites linking III and broader Liberty-sphere sites recently?
Why the sudden push by an intolerant and militant Christian Identity movement within the Liberty sphere? You must remember that Christian Identity philosophy in America is not about Christianity - it is about racism. "It isn't about race..." are the words you will hear from every Christian Identity fuck who chooses to remain in the closet. It is about Fascism and outright respect for Hitler.
Why were secessionist petitions dropped on WhiteHouse.gov and so heavily covered by Big Media? Why would any modern White House of the United States ever put itself in a position to have to answer the question of secession...unless they want the question to be asked, with all of the inherent Black versus White undertones that must accompany the question.
Why has MSM allowed serious, high-level political animals, from Buchanan to Maddow, to speak of Revolution, War, Secession?
Why is the President giving his State of the Union on Lincoln's birthday? Why will he place his hand on Lincoln's Bible when he takes the oath?
Why is the Left suddenly charging at 2A so hard? Politically it does not make sense, unless you are willing to consider "Fringe" possibilities...like they want a Lexington. 2A is one of the few known triggers to War in America...
Why now? Why is it all coming together within months of the election, at the beginning of a Presidential second term with a government filled with Marxists, supported by more than 1/2 of our nation because they are the direct beneficiaries of Marxist theft...
Those of you who are thinkers have already started connecting dots. I'm going to offer only a thumbnail sketch because we still do not have all the facts. However, if you ignore the collection of facts above, or if you swallow the excuse that the current 2A infringement push is an organic reaction to Sandy Hook, you are failing yourself, your family and Tribe.
Remember this is a polygonal battlespace. Remember the Marxists and their tools of Government are very sophisticated and experienced at infiltrating their enemies and laying the ground for multi-faceted strikes and mis-direction. Remember that the Marxist push to kill America is more than 150 years old, and the players of the game are generational in their thinking. Is it time for the Final Phase? Is this their moment to strike and throat-punch America since our fundamentals are so compromised, and impose their Marxist will openly and to declare American Liberty is dead?
2A is a known trigger for War in America, among Americans. That trigger is being stroked hard right now.
The very concept of secession in America carries the racial baggage of 1860, and secession is being engaged by the highest office in America.
Racial and Class enmities are being stroked hard by this Administration.
The recent intrusion of very vocal Christian Identity racists into the Liberty sphere helps re-enforce the stereotype that the Liberty Movement is all about race mongering, and race mongerers are enemies of modern America, just as they were in 1860...
Marxists hold every significant facet of persuasion in American life: Government, Academia, Media, financial markets/investors/bankers, and even our citizenry has been enlisted to be allies of Marxism as they are bribed with the fruits of your labors.
Possible Conclusion: RevWarIII is imminent. It will be presented as finishing the noble work of Lincoln - eradicating racism and bigotry in America by eradicating the bitter clingers.
The real premise beneath the sales pitch is pure Marxism seeking to claim America as her final trophy.
There are many, many Sparklies being thrown into the air right now. Don't get distracted. Don't fall for the spin. Liberty or Tyranny. One will win.
And the militant Christians who claim to be advocates of Liberty, yet define that Liberty differently for people who do not believe what they believe and people who are not like them, those militant Christians are either provocateurs or a malignancy as bad as the Marxist. Treat them thusly.
Watch your flanks, Patriots. Question everything. Question everyone and their motives.
Trust, but verify.
The one person you can't afford to question, is the one in the mirror.
Rightful Liberty is the North Star.
Follow it.
Kerodin
III
You bring up some VERY good points. Though I hate to say it, they are trying really hard for another "Fort Sumter". And the whole "Lincoln" meme is almost taunting in its nature. Bastards...
ReplyDelete"And the militant Christians who claim to be advocates of Liberty, yet define that Liberty differently for people who do not believe what they believe and people who are not like them, those militant Christians are either provocateurs or a malignancy as bad as the Marxist. Treat them thusly."
ReplyDeleteLike that Founding generation, whose blood bought us all this gift we call 'America', and who had NO PROBLEM with anti-blasphemy laws, 'Sunday laws' (ie businesses to be closed on Sundays), who in many states legally refused to allow atheists or agnostics in public office (since, they reasoned, such persons who have no belief in a future state of rewards and punishments could not be trusted), etc etc? Those 'militant Christians' (extremists) like the Scotts worthies who populated much of the colonies and seasoned it with anti-tyranny sentiments? And who were generally hardcore theonomists?
That 'malignancy' and those 'provocateurs'? Like the Pilgrims and Puritans who 'militant Christian theology' formed the moral and ethical backbone of American Revolutionary ideology?
The American Revolution was known in England as 'the Presbyterian Rebellion'.
Sir, I have followed your blog for awhile. Although I have not been and am not able to move to Idaho, nor to contribute financially to the III project, as I am a blue collar worker making just enough for my family's beans, bullets, and bandaids, I have spread the word about the citadel project. I have always considered you to be on point in many ways for the effort to restore Liberty.
But now I see you are just another run of the mill antiChristian bigot. Truly, no different from the Marxists who are currently lording it over us all. What really is the difference between them and yourself? You BOTH seek out opportunity to denigrate Christians, and you BOTH seem to think the only 'acceptable' Christian is a quiet, unassuming, passive, PUSSY Christian. One who keeps his or her faith to themself. 'You can believe what you want, just keep yer mouth shut about it', right?
What I see, more and more, in the 'patriot movement' (a misnomer if ever there was one), is a separation going on. Christians are being identified as 'the enemy' by not only the communist scum but also by 'the patriot movement' (which by the way, the MAJORITY of people in the patriot, liberty, militia, RKBA movement ARE CHRISTIANS).
So. We're not welcome to the party. Big tent and all, just not big enough for any of those uppity Christians.
Not a problem. Has, in fact, been that way from the beginning.
I wish you and your people the best of Providence, and am sad to see you are casting your lot with whoever it may be 'as long as it isn't those dad-gummed Christians'.
More and more, I and other of those 'malignant Christians' whom I know out here 'in real life' are coming to the conclusion that it really is 'us vs the world'. It is as if God is calling His people to obey the scripture - 'be not unequally yoked with unbelievers' and 'come out from among them'.
No sense trying to be allies with people who despise you, despise your faith, despise your heritage, etc.
Frank, in Texas
Frank: If you took from this column that I am anti-Christian, you did not read closely.
DeleteI am anti-Christians-who-use-religion-as-a-weapon-to-be-racist.
Big difference from being "Anti-Christian".
When a "Christian" says you must be White to be a "real" Christian - yeah, I have a problem with that on many levels.
K
The battle has ALWAYS been individualism versus collectivism. Anything else is a distraction.
DeleteFrank-in-Texas,
DeleteWhat Kerodin clearly said is he does not want to be associated with racist. That is it. No matter what snake skin racist cover themselves with. Racism and true liberty do not go together. Plus racism is without reason.
K -Aparently our anonymous friend has never run across the folks you are warning about as "christian identity" groups. Wish I could say the same...fact is, they're out there folks, they can be very subtle, and they are scary. Be very sure before you put your eggs in a group's basket, or you may get scrambled without further warning. 'Nuff Said.
DeleteI am a Christian and I too was offended because I wasn't sure what point you were making. But I don't know anyone who fits into the category of "-Christians-who-use-religion-as-a-weapon-to-be-racist" and most everyone I associate with are Christians. The lot you write of must be few and far between. I've never met one. I would warn that with your attitude of condemnation I feel lumped into a category that I don't want to be part of. You could very well offend and alienate a lot of good people.
DeleteAnon: I am pleased you do not know anyone who hides within religion to exercise their racism - but they are out there as LT notes. Not only are they out there, they try to "mainstream" by seeking the illusion that they are Liberty advocates. They are the people who make real Christians and real Patriots look extreme. And that is partly their goal. They want to hide within our ranks.
DeleteLook up "Christian Identity" and their connections to the Aryans and more.
Now look across our blogs and find the "religious Christians" who rationalize and even defend Hitler, who constantly make nuanced references to a nationalism based on Christianity, which you will find does not include other ethinicites or races, and is rabidly intolerant of personal liberties. The "live-and-let-live" gene does not exist in these people, regardless of the packaging they try to put forward.
Watch for it, and you'll see it.
K
K, It will actually BE continuing the work of that bastard oligarch Lincoln. To stamp out the men who only desire to be free and left alone. The war wasn't about slavery, it was about whether free men could choose to leave a contract. Slavery was an ugly fact, but what happened to the South after was worse.
ReplyDeleteObama IS much like Lincoln, they are correct in that correlation.
It all comes down to collectivism or individualism. Free vs. serf.
Good post. We can't get muddied by racist groups or fascist ideals -55six
A fact that is rarely mentioned is that while slavery was abolished in the South, it wasn't abolished in the North right away. Southerners were cast as evil for doing the same thing that was going on in the north. 55six is absolutely right. It was never about slavery. The .gov wanted then and wants now to make us all equal slaves.
ReplyDeleteLearned people here! The only remaining truth on the planet! Thank God for your last remaining wisdom!
ReplyDeleteYes the regime has cultivated a secular and racial divide since its onset. There will without a doubt be war cast on us by the evil that owns almost all things except your souls and our guns. It will be as stated in these great posts, the Marxist as a tool of the globalist, who has used our history as emotional weapons to stir the elixir, potent to liberty, deadly to all. This evil doesn't care about victory because it's success is only tied to the suffering of God's children. If you notice, there has been no logic in the Marxist intentions, other than to unearth old hatred that we are all susceptible to because of our earthly nature.
I read where someone wrote on this subject that in victory if morality is restored then the Constitution will be as well. True!
Early governments were organized by religious dogma and rules. Christianity was horrifically cruel and murderous as with all early forms of government. Fundamental belief was the cold hammer of law and justice in a theocracy and you only had one freedom…a belief in God or die. America was founded on Freedom. A new form of government never tried before in known history. The Constitution stands as the Twin Towers of Freedom in America and every form of government and religion hates it because it stands in the way of their takeover of America. Religious enjoy only one part of it which is the part they think infuses religion into the Constitution. Fundamentalist do not want freedom and the constitution…they want God and religion in power ruling America. It was not “Freedom of religion” it is freedom free of religious persecution. As long as the constitution stands as the law of the people the fundi’s can’t emplace their God and religion in power over the people. Fundi’s are at war with the constitution just the same as every other organization or government power that seeks to take over America. This is a monster war that stared before the ink was even dry on the Constitution. The moral majority seek to destroy America as we know it to emplace yet another theocracy of dogma rule that will strip personal freedom in exchange for the infallible word of God rule. What is scary to me is I think the religious “know not what they do.”
ReplyDelete"Now the Lord is that Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." II Cor. 3:17. Where in this scripture is the desire to subjugate a nation to religious absolutism expressed? "Fundamentalist do not want freedom and the constitution…they want God and religion in power ruling America." Maybe you were referring to Islamists here, but none of the fundamentalist Christians I know hold this position. Granted, they would have a populous willingly following Christ, but none would want their religious views imposed on anyone forcefully, against their will. They recognize that the Constitution protects their religious freedom, as well as everyone else's. No fundamentalist I know is at war with the Constitution, nor seeks to take over the country for God. God is well capable of taking over this country all by himself (See The Great Awakening). In fact, the fundamentalists I know are concerned about having to fight FOR the Constitution's continued existance. The boldness with which you make your unfounded, slanderous assertions about fundamentalists angers me. People should disregard everything you posted. It is a testimony to the Constitutional protections that you enjoy that you can, with impunity, poison the conversation with so many untruths.
DeleteKeep in mind and add to this mix the teetering value of the US Dollar... hyper inflation could bring this whole house of cards down very quickly- the .thugs think they will be able to keep a lid on this whole place when their destruction of our monetary system goes down... what do they intend to pay their 'protection' with anyway? Some new digital currency? Anyway, this is a key aspect to keep an eye out for along with all the others.
ReplyDeleteAllovertheplace:
ReplyDeleteAbsolute liberty is a tyranny of liberty, because if you have it, how do you enforce it?
I am one who has considered both approaches to what has now become a struggle for survival deeply and have come to no profound philisophical conclusions save this: I do not believe that in reality white patriots or white Christian patriots will discover compatriots in the ghettos or barrios in the struggle for the philosophical or physical heritage rendered to their succeeding generations by their jealous use of force.
Wow K, there's been a looney parade right through yer comment section, today... I'd say you've struck a nerve.
ReplyDeleteAnd what a nerve they have, too - claiming to be III; claiming to be ready to step up and fight for liberty, when what they're really itching for is a race war...
And perhaps racial separatism really is an answer - for those too limited, either in education or self-regulation, to handle themselves in a world as large and varied as that which God gave us. I'll not claim expertise in the matter, since the question doesn't hold sufficient interest for me to spend that kind of time on.
Instead, I've spent my time and effort seeking to understand who we (the Body of Christ) are, what we are [supposed to be] doing, and what prophecy says we will do in the future...
Not just the eschatological (end times) prophecies, the ones folks seem to obsess about, but the entire body of God's word, for all of it is Law, and all of it is parable, and all of it is prophesy, also.
In this instance, pertaining to the question of "christian identity" and racial conflict, my mind goes directly to First John, chapter 5, Verses 1~5 and also 19~20 -
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ, is born of God. And every one that loveth him who begot, loveth him also who is born of him. In this we know that we love the children of God: when we love God, and keep his commandments. For this is the charity of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not heavy. For whatsoever is born of God, overcometh the world: and this is the victory which overcometh the world, our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
...
We know that we are of God, and the whole world is seated in wickedness. And we know that the Son of God is come: and he hath given us understanding that we may know the true God, and may be in his true Son. This is the true God and life eternal.
~~~~~
So if they are truly Christians, then their bond in Christ loves equally all others also born in Christ - in the Body of Christ there is no distinction of 'race', nor is there 'class', nor is there "privileged" or "unprivileged"; because we all descended into death with Christ when we went under the water of Baptism, and all that we were which was defined by the nature and authority of the world died beneath the water, thus cleansing us for the entry of the Holy Spirity which entered us when we rose from the waters of Baptism - this is the very moment we were fashioned into new beings by Christ, when His spirit entered us as we rose from the waters of Baptism.
Thus we "love him also who is born of Him" without adding conditions of our own. And "whatsoever is born of God, overcometh the world" - and what is the world, but the sum of those divisions which prevent us obtaining the abundant life of the spirit? We are told that "the whole world is seated in wickedness"; and what are the chief evils which belong to the world? Race, Class, Wealth, Fame, soicial and political position, appearance, and every other phenomenal attribute of our persons, whether direct or ascribed - the sum of these evils *are* the world, which we overcome in Baptism.
Now, if after our baptism we return to those evils, and again burden ourselves with them, then that is our fault, and we have work to do to make our amends with Christ, and also with His Body.
So if those of "christian identity" aren't finding themselves to be "overcomers of the world", as Christ promises, then perhaps they ought to look inward, rather than outward, to find the impediment which stands between them and the abundant life of the spirit which He has provided for us?
(Ctd)
ReplyDeleteThis is one of those instances where many would pounce at the opportunity to quote Matthew Ch.7 and the whole thing about removing the splinter from your own eye first, because it's a verse they actually know - but it's not really applicable here.
I would instead direct those claiming "christian identity" as a justification for racial bias, to meditate on God's warning regarding having two separate standards (weights) - one for friends and another for strangers - or otherwise cheating others by the use of a perverted scales or measure, which can be found in the following - Proverbs 20:23, Proverbs 11:1, Deuteronomy25:13~18 - all of which proclaim it to be an Abomination to trade or deal with people unequally. Not just a sin, but an Abomination...
And this is supplemented in Leviticus 19:13, which states, "Thou shalt not calumniate thy neighbour, nor oppress him by violence. The wages of him that hath been hired by thee shall not abide with thee until the morning. Thou shalt not speak evil of the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind: but thou shalt fear the Lord thy God, because I am the Lord. Thou shalt not do that which is unjust, nor judge unjustly. Respect not the person of the poor, nor honour the countenance of the mighty. But judge thy neighbour according to justice. Thou shalt not be a detractor nor a whisperer among the people. Thou shalt not stand against the blood of thy neighbour. I am the Lord. Seek not revenge, nor be mindful of the injury of thy citizens. Thou shalt love thy friend as thyself. I am the Lord."
Hopefully everyone gets it as this point - to judge man because of his race is not in accordance with God's will. To murmur and foster division amongst men is in itself a sin. To deal with one group of people using a different standard than you deal with your favored group is not only sinful, it is an Abomination unto the Lord.
WE HAVE BEEN WARNED