...you've already lost.
The current gun debate is taking shape as semi-auto is bad. Hi cap is bad. Blah, blah...
Where is our side that says: No, you may not have my 10" AR select-fire.
Where is our side that says: I bought this sweet CNC so I can build my own M2, and no you can't have it.
Where is our side that says: Shall not be infringed...and fuck you for trying.
Until we stop fighting the enemies fight on the enemies turf, we are destined to forever fail.
Kerodin
III
And let's not forget using their methods as well. Some reporter releases a list of people with carry permits, obtain and release his personal information. That sort of thing. If it's public information, it isn't illegal. It should be used in the most damaging, humiliating manner possible. They lie about gun owners, be sure that stuff gets out about them (true or not). They need to know that they cannot oppress openly without reprisal, even if it is just the nuisance sort that ruins the cocktail parties.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of the reasons I suggested yesterday to get email addresses, user handles, etc., and to follow them on various social media channels. People are incredibly stupid about what they put out there. One slip up that you manage to get to go viral could end their career if they are in the right industry and say the right dumb thing. We all know good and well that agents provocateur are all over the patriot movement, trying to create division. We need to flow through the gaps in their guard and dose them up with their own medicine.
-Shall not be infringed...and fuck you for trying.
ReplyDeleteWhat a campaign slogan!
Yea Bonnie, I like that for a motto and a slogan. I has a final ring to it.
DeletePapa Mike
III
Sam,
ReplyDeleteWe do need a absolutely no compromise gun and constitution lobby if you will. Will this be part of the III Congress' job to come up with these things? Every single gun law that exist is unconstitutional. The 2nd was written for men, by men to kill tyrants.
Mike M.
"Every single gun law that exist is unconstitutional. The 2nd was written for men, by men to kill tyrants."
DeleteYeah Mike, those words are tough to understand---"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Gee, so many possible meanings.
And just in case anyone ever doubted the meaning you present, they even prefixed an explanatory clause!
I think the Congress is the ideal place for such a hard position.
DeleteK
i agree wholeheartedly with this position but would add that there must be a plank for Constitutional Review of every single law presented to Congress added to our platform.. this review is to be made by a fully qualified Constitutionalist Constitutional lawyer... not by some yale or harvard jerkbuddy who was willing to be cornholed by his elder frat bros to gain acceptance... "Executive" Authority must go as well... no more EO's or the like
ReplyDelete